Back to blog
Healthcare Trends

Healthcare Errors That Impacted Patient Safety

Healthcare errors can involve medication, diagnosis, communication, or patient identification. Learn how teams can respond to safety events and improve the systems around care.

Mousa Kadaei

Mousa Kadaei

Product & Growth Manager, EMR · 12 min read ·

A minimal cream-toned healthcare illustration with connected icons and interface cards representing healthcare trends.

Patient safety means reducing the risk of preventable harm associated with health care and responding when something goes wrong. A healthcare error is not automatically the same as patient harm: some errors are intercepted before reaching a patient, and an adverse outcome does not by itself prove that an error occurred. Clear definitions help teams investigate events fairly and learn what can make care safer.

Common types of healthcare errors and safety events

Safety problems can arise across settings and at different points in care. Examples include:

  • Medication-related events: a prescribing, dispensing, administration, or monitoring problem involving a medicine.
  • Diagnostic problems: a missed, delayed, or incorrect diagnosis, or a delay in communicating or acting on a result.
  • Communication and handoff failures: important information is incomplete, misunderstood, or not transferred to the person responsible for the next step.
  • Patient-identification mismatches: information, a specimen, medication, or service is linked to the wrong person.
  • Procedure and infection-prevention events: a breakdown in planning, verification, sterile technique, or follow-up that may expose a patient to avoidable risk.
  • Falls and other care-related injuries: a patient is harmed during care or while a known risk is not adequately addressed.

These are examples, not a ranking. Which events occur and how they are classified depends on the setting, reporting rules, and facts of the case.

Why errors happen: look at the work system

Health care involves complex tasks, handoffs, technologies, time pressures, and changing patient needs. A systems approach asks how those conditions shaped an event—not only who was closest to it. Contributing factors may include unclear procedures, confusing screen design, interruptions, staffing or workload pressures, incomplete information, equipment issues, or a process that makes the safe action difficult.

This does not remove individual accountability. It helps an organization choose a response that addresses both the specific actions and the conditions around them. AHRQ’s PSNet systems-approach guidance emphasizes identifying risks in the design of care and changing systems to reduce the chance of recurrence or limit the impact of errors.

What a care team can do after a safety event

  1. Address immediate safety needs. Follow clinical escalation procedures and make sure the patient receives appropriate evaluation and care.
  2. Preserve and report relevant information. Use the organization’s reporting process for events and near misses. Record factual details, timing, and known actions according to policy.
  3. Review the process with the right people. Involve staff familiar with the work, relevant clinical and operational leaders, and patient-safety expertise. Consider handoffs, tools, workload, training, and policies.
  4. Choose an improvement that addresses a contributing factor. Examples may include simplifying a confusing step, improving a handoff, clarifying responsibility for test results, or changing how identity is verified. Match the action to the specific event rather than applying a generic fix.
  5. Measure whether the change helps. Track whether the new process is being used, whether the intended safety outcome changes, and whether there are unintended effects elsewhere.
  6. Communicate and learn. Follow applicable disclosure, documentation, and reporting requirements. Share lessons through the organization’s safety processes while protecting patient privacy.

Examples of practical prevention steps

Make medication workflows easier to verify

Use clear medication lists and reconciliation steps, reduce ambiguous instructions, and define who follows up on important results or changes. Barcode or electronic tools can support safer processes, but they need appropriate setup, training, and a reliable fallback when a scan or system is unavailable.

Strengthen diagnostic follow-up

Define who reviews results, how urgent findings are escalated, and how the team confirms that the patient has received next-step instructions. A result being entered in a record is not the same as the right person reviewing it and completing follow-up.

Use consistent patient identification

Follow the identifiers and verification steps required by the care setting and task. ONC describes patient matching as linking a person’s data using multiple demographic fields; a close match should not be treated as certainty. When information does not match, pause and use the organization’s correction and escalation process.

Support speaking up and reporting

Staff need a practical way to flag hazards and near misses without fear that reporting alone will trigger blame. Leaders can close the loop by explaining what was learned and which changes were made. A reporting system is useful when it leads to review and action, not merely a larger count of reports.

How to measure improvement responsibly

Choose a measure that reflects the specific safety aim. Teams may track a process measure (whether a verification step is completed), an outcome measure (whether the targeted event or harm changes), and a balancing measure (whether the new process creates delays or workarounds). Define the data source and review trends over time. A single incident count can rise when reporting improves, so interpret it alongside context and other evidence rather than assuming that more reports automatically mean care became less safe.

Key takeaway

Safer care depends on reliable workflows, clear communication, thoughtful use of technology, and a culture that learns from events. When something goes wrong, support the patient first, understand the factors that contributed, make a targeted change, and check whether it works.

This article is general educational information. Organizations should follow their current clinical, regulatory, accreditation, reporting, and disclosure requirements.

Sources

Mousa Kadaei

Written by

Mousa Kadaei

Product & Growth Manager, EMR

Mousa is a product and growth manager at Ambula. He designs products around what doctors need and writes about healthcare technology.

Built around the case, not the visit

Intake, charting, orders, records and lien billing for personal injury clinics, in one system.