Back to blog
Medical Billing

The Three Main Types of Medical Billing Systems: Closed, Open and Isolated

What closed, open and isolated medical billing systems mean, which one most practices actually use, how they differ from payment models, and where lien billing fits in a mixed-payer practice.

A

Ambula Team

6 min read ·

A staff member in a dark polo works at a computer in a bright clinic office.

Search for the types of medical billing and you will usually find the same three labels: closed, open and isolated. You will also find articles that use "billing methods" to mean something else entirely, such as fee-for-service or value-based payment. Both questions come up when a practice is choosing software or setting up its billing, so this guide answers both.

It is written for practice owners, office managers and billing staff, including practices that treat both insurance and personal injury patients. It explains what each of the three labels means, which one describes most practices today, how billing systems differ from payment models, and where lien-based billing fits.

What are the three main types of medical billing systems?

The three types usually named are closed, open and isolated billing systems. The labels describe how far patient and billing information can travel: within one practice (closed), across providers (open), or only with the patient (isolated).

These are informal terms used in billing training and industry writing, not categories defined by a regulator, and different writers use them a little differently. They map most closely to three kinds of health record that federal sources do define: the electronic medical record (EMR), the electronic health record (EHR) and the personal health record (PHR).

TypeClosest record typeWho holds the informationHow far it travels
ClosedEMROne practiceStays inside that practice
OpenEHRSeveral providers and organizationsShared with other providers involved in the patient's care, and accessible to the patient
IsolatedPHRThe patientWherever the patient chooses to take it

What is a closed billing system?

A closed billing system keeps clinical and billing information inside one practice. The practice charts, codes and bills from its own records, and the data does not easily move to other providers.

This matches how the Office of the National Coordinator for Health IT (ONC) has described an EMR: a digital version of the paper chart in one clinician's office, with information that generally does not travel easily outside that practice. The benefit is control. The practice decides who sees what. The drawback is that when another provider treats the same patient, records have to be requested and sent separately.

What is an open billing system?

An open billing system shares information across the providers who treat the same patient. Records and related data can move between practices, hospitals, labs and other organizations involved in care.

ONC has described the EHR this way: a record built to reach beyond the organization that first collected the information, so it can be shared with other providers and accessed by the patient. Sharing reduces repeated paperwork and missing history. It also means more people and systems touch the data, so access controls and HIPAA (Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act) safeguards matter more.

What is an isolated billing system?

An isolated system puts the patient in charge of the record. The patient keeps their own health information and decides who sees it.

This is the personal health record model. MedlinePlus, from the National Library of Medicine, describes a personal health record as something the patient keeps for themselves, separate from the records held by doctors' offices and hospitals, and suggests it can include medicines, allergies, test results and past surgeries. In practice, an isolated record is rarely how a medical office actually bills. Claims still come from the provider's own system.

Which type do most practices use today?

Most practices bill from an EMR or practice management system they control, which looks like the closed model, while also exchanging data with payers and other providers electronically. In real life the lines blur.

Under HIPAA, health plans and covered providers use adopted electronic standards for transactions such as eligibility checks, claims, claim status and payment and remittance advice. So even a practice whose clinical records stay in-house sends standardized data out to payers every day. When you compare systems, it is more useful to ask practical questions than to pick a label:

  • Who controls access to the chart and the bill?
  • How are records shared with other providers or with an attorney, and is each release logged?
  • How are claims, eligibility checks and payments handled electronically?
  • Is the system cloud-based or installed on your own servers? Our guide to cloud-based and on-premise billing software covers that choice.

How are billing systems different from payment models?

A billing system is how the practice records and sends charges. A payment model is how the practice gets paid for its care. The two are separate decisions, and one billing system usually has to handle several payment models.

  • Fee-for-service. The practice is paid for each visit, test or procedure billed.
  • Value-based payment. Payment is tied, at least in part, to quality. CMS (the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services) describes its value-based programs as rewarding providers for the quality of care rather than the quantity.
  • Capitation. The practice receives a set amount per patient for a period, however many services the patient uses.

Separately, practices also deal with different payer sources: commercial insurance, government programs, patients paying directly, and, for injury cases, payment deferred until the case resolves.

How does lien-based billing fit in a mixed-payer practice?

In a personal injury case, the practice often treats the patient under a medical lien or a letter of protection and is paid from the settlement or judgment instead of by a health plan at the time of service. The practice still codes and charges each visit, but the balance is tracked on the case until it resolves.

Many practices see both kinds of patients. An insurance patient's claim goes to the health plan. A personal injury patient's charges build an itemized bill that the attorney receives, sometimes over many months. Running both from one system means the same coding habits apply to every patient, and staff do not keep a second system just for injury cases.

How Ambula handles insurance and personal injury billing

Ambula is a cloud-based EMR for personal injury practices, including pain management, orthopedics, chiropractic and neurology, and for surgery centers. Insurance and personal injury patients run in the same EMR at $300 per provider per month, as listed on our pricing page.

On personal injury cases, patients sign intake, consent and lien forms from their phone, and the referring attorney is on file from day one. The personal injury EMR keeps the attorney, the lien, the records and the settlement on one case. Through the Lawyer Portal, law firms see only the records and bills you choose to share. Practices that want a team to run their claims can also use Ambula's revenue cycle management services.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between open and closed medical billing?

A closed system keeps clinical and billing information inside one practice. An open system shares it with other providers involved in the patient's care. The terms are informal and correspond roughly to an EMR and an EHR.

Are closed, open and isolated official billing categories?

No. They are informal labels used in training and industry writing, and definitions vary. Federal sources define the record types they resemble, the EMR, EHR and PHR, but not these billing labels.

What are the main healthcare payment models?

The common ones are fee-for-service, value-based payment and capitation. They describe how a practice is paid, which is a separate question from the software it uses to bill.

Can one system handle insurance and lien billing?

Yes, if it supports both workflows. Ambula runs insurance and personal injury patients in one EMR, so injury cases keep their liens and attorney records without a separate system.

This content is for informational purposes only. It is not legal or billing advice. Lien and letter of protection rules vary by state, and payer and HIPAA requirements change over time. Consult your payer policies, your state's rules and a licensed attorney or compliance adviser for guidance specific to your practice.

Sources

A

Written by

Ambula Team

Personal injury EMR and surgery center software

Ambula is the operating system for personal injury clinics and surgery centers. Our team writes about intake, charting, records, billing and liens, and how each fits into the case.

Built around the case, not the visit

Intake, charting, orders, records and lien billing for personal injury clinics, in one system.